Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger, creators of the Lominger
competency suite, have noted that the overuse of strengths is a common reason
why some leaders fail to successfully navigate the path from the individual
contributor’s role to the CEO level – the route that Ram Charan has called the
Leadership Pipeline. As Lominger associates Linda Hodge and David Workman put
it, when some leaders transition to higher levels of leadership, they
experience problems “not because of a weakness per se, but because their
strengths have gone into overdrive. They continue to use what worked in the
past and fail to learn new skills for the new situation.” The first-line
manager who routinely knocks down obstacles to get things done may find that
bullish approach less effective in a manager-of-managers role that requires
more influencing and consensus-building.
So, if we want to move forward in our careers, must we suppress or
even unlearn our strengths? The danger is that we may start to overfocus on our
weaknesses to the point of losing sight of the natural, distinctive
capabilities that have brought us success in the first place. We may then spend
the rest of our careers trying to shoehorn ourselves into roles that don’t
really fit us.
A better development strategy than downplaying strengths, say Hodge
and Workman, is to focus on building “compensators,” which they describe as
“competencies that can neutralize or balance overused strengths.” For example,
the leader with a strong bias for action can develop interpersonal skills
(approachability, humor) that can take the rough edges off his or her
hard-charging approach.
REFLECTIONS FOR THE YES! LEADER
One competency in particular – the ability to truly listen – has been shown to be what Hodge
and Workman call “the universal compensator.” “Improving listening skills,”
they note, “can take the sharp edges off as many as 30 overused strengths.
People who become better listeners look more patient, less arrogant, more
approachable.”
·
Do you define “listening” as “the time I have to wait until I can
start talking again”?
·
When a team member stops you to discuss something of importance to
him, how well does your body language reveal your level of engagement? Are you
looking the person in the eye – but pointing your feet down the hall?
·
To what extent do you focus on your own agenda, to the exclusion
of other perspectives and concerns? Even if immediate action is required, do
you ever circle back with people to address their concerns after the fact?

No comments:
Post a Comment