Customer-service providers often find themselves on the
receiving end of objections. For example, a customer might call a customer
service line with a complaint: “I want to place an order on your website but I can’t
find the link. Why don’t you people make it easier for customers to access it?”
A quick (silent) thought might flash in the service
provider’s mind: “Why don’t you slow down and try to find it before leaping
onto the phone?” Based on this instant assessment of the cause of the issue,
the provider might then go on the offense and say, “Sir, we’ve thoroughly tested
the interface with users, and they’ve told us they have no problems with it.
You just need to look more closely at the screen.”
As I mentioned in my article on Openness, the provider’s
immediate dash up the Ladder of Inference will probably lead to a dissatisfied
customer. A better way to respond (and to put Openness into practice) is to
take a Yes And approach.
As I’ve described it previously, saying Yes And doesn’t necessarily mean Agreeing with the Position that the other person is taking. Instead, it means:
·
Accepting
the Person;
·
Acknowledging
the Possibilities in what he’s
saying; and
·
Advancing
with Positive Purpose.
In the above example, the provider could apply the Yes And model as follows:
ACCEPT THE PERSON:
As she answers, the provider should first of all be polite with the customer, to
validate the fact that the customer has a problem and that the provider can
offer help. As the customer describes the issue, the provider should maintain a
positive mindset toward the customer, framing him in her mind as a person who’s
genuinely trying to overcome an obstacle. In doing this, the provider should do
her best to put herself in the customer’s shoes and see the problem through his
eyes.
ACKNOWLEDGE THE
POSSIBILITIES: To avoid rushing up the Ladder of Inference, the provider
should try to discover the source of the customer’s problem through strategic
questioning. “Strategic questioning” involves a mix of open-ended questions and
closed-ended questions. Open-ended questions (e.g., “What are you seeing on your
screen?”) work best for discovering what the customer is experiencing – so that
the provider truly can “see through
his eyes.” Closed-ended questions – those that can be answered with a “yes,” “no,”
or other one-word answer – are best for establishing threshold facts (“Are you
logged on?”) and confirming results (“Did that work?”).
ADVANCE WITH
POSITIVE PURPOSE: By asking questions, the provider opens herself to
several different possible explanations for the customer’s problem. It could be that the customer is on the wrong
tab, or that he needs to scroll horizontally to find the link. Or it could be
that the website itself is experiencing a problem. By broadening the
possibilities, the provider also broadens the range of solutions that might
address the issue. The provider can also
then offer multiple options to the customer in order to involve him in a joint
search for solutions. As we saw with the Tradeoff Triangle, providing the
customer with choices is the essence of advancing with positive purpose – for
purposes of not only solving the immediate issue but also sustaining a
relationship with the customer in the future.
The Yes And approach can work effectively in a wide range
of contexts – customer service, sales, team meetings, conflict, and any other
situation in which objections can occur. It’s another great example of the
application of the core skill of Openness.

No comments:
Post a Comment