1) He’ll resent your denial of his “cloud” offer;
2) He’ll feel more like a second banana than an equal
partner in the creation of the scene;
3) He’ll retaliate by denying your offers;
4) He’ll focus less on listening to you and more on
vigorously asserting his own ideas of where the scene should go.
While all of this is being played out, the audience will
become wise to the fact that you’re trying to upstage your partner and trying
to put on a one-man show – and that’s not what they came to see. Savvy improv
audiences expect a collaborative give-and-take, not a struggle for dominance. A
bout of back-and-forth contradiction (a la Monty Python’s Argument Clinic
sketch) is, frankly, boring to watch.
If you think about it, business organizations tend to be
hotbeds of offer-rejection. In a typical meeting, you frequently hear people
insistently asserting their positions and trying to get the upper hand, rather than listening to each other,
seeking to understand the other’s point of view, and working together to find a
solution. The results of offer-rejection behavior in the meeting room are the
same as they are onstage: resentment, suspension of listening, power plays,
competition, retaliation. To outside observers, the proceedings would probably
seem as boring and banal as a contentious round of one-upmanship between two improv performers.
REFLECTIONS FOR THE YES! LEADER
Improv performers have a lot to teach the YES! Leader
about what true collaboration looks like – and how to achieve it. Many improv
activities (for example, Word at a Time Story) are geared toward giving
performers (and nonperformers as well) a sense of how it feels to go with the
flow of a group-created effort. Such an activity can also be a gauge of a
person’s natural comfort (or lack thereof) with relinquishing control and
seeing what emerges from the group process.
You might benefit from these kinds of activities if your
typical meeting behaviors include:
· Getting frustrated when somebody makes a
suggestion or observation that seems impractical or off the wall, rather than
asking the person to elaborate and opening your mind to the possibilities;
· Invariably responding to another’s opinion (“I
think X!”) with your own opinion (“Yeah, well I think Y!”) rather than a
question (“Why do you think X?”);
· Prematurely cutting off brainstorming and
kicking around of ideas by saying, “We need to get going on this. Here’s what
we’ll do …”
· Putting down others’ contributions by using IdeaChillers such as “We tried that before and it didn’t work” or “You can’t be
serious!”

No comments:
Post a Comment