I’m sure that many people who want to become more
effective in their jobs intuitively understand the universal importance of “moving
others,” even if they’ve never thought of it in those terms. More likely,
though, they’ve probably thought of their development challenges in terms of
distinct situations such as:
·
Influencing
others to adopt a certain point of view;
·
Managing
up, i.e., influencing their direct managers;
·
Negotiating
with suppliers and vendors;
·
Inspiring
others to get behind an initiative they’re spearheading;
·
Motivating
direct reports to improve their performance.
And of course:
·
Selling
goods and services to customers.
Depending on how a person defines her development
challenge, she’s likely to go looking for a training class that targets the
specific situation – say, “Being an Inspirational Leader” or “Motivating for
Results.” (I made up these titles, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there are
actual classes by those names.)
I think Pink’s book highlights an important fact:
Regardless of the specific content of any of these types of programs, there exists a set of core skills that are
common to all of them – in this case, the “moving others” skill set. Some of these core skills include:
·
Seeing the world through others’ eyes;
·
Showing curiosity about others’ point of view by
asking powerful questions;
·
Addressing people from their own frame of
reference;
·
Avoiding regarding others as “adversaries” or “resisters”
but instead thinking of them as potential partners in a joint search for solutions;
·
Showing people how an idea will benefit them and
make their lives better;
·
Communicating ideas and concepts in the other person’s
language and seeking to connect your idea to something they care about.
Identifying a set of core skills such as “moving others”
can help establish connections between individual development planning and
organizational talent management. For example, a curriculum could be
established that focuses on conveying the core skills first (say, Moving Others
101). Learners could then “major” in more specific areas that build on the core
set, such as influencing, motivating, selling, and so on.
Defining core skill sets can also facilitate the
identification of performance expectations for each role within the organization.
For example, a project manager could be held accountable for using the “moving
others” skill set in order to secure resources from functional managers and
motivate team members to complete tasks. By contrast, while a group manager
would still use the same basic “moving others” skill set, the results to which
she would be held accountable via that skill set would look very different – say,
getting functional managers to work together, or inspiring others to get behind
an organizational change. In this way, the exercise of the skills doesn’t become
an end in itself but is seen as a means to achieving goals that can be measured
in operational terms.
Finally, defining core skills can benefit succession planning, career pathing, and individual development
by highlighting the similarities among skills in different job families and/or levels of responsibility. In the above example, the project manager can see his role as providing an
on-the-job development experience for the "moving others" core skill (and other core skills) that can prepare him for a wider scope of leadership
responsibility within the organization.
In my next article, I’ll elaborate on this concept of
core skill sets.
No comments:
Post a Comment